Page 21 - O2-A3_DELTA_DE_Toolkit_for_Mentors_and_Tutors
P. 21
aspects to improve:
● Too much bureaucracy and rigidity to fulfil education criteria that are far
from the companies´ interests.
● Lack of time and/or preparation of the tutors in company to teach.
● Difficulties to combine job tasks with learning outcomes defined in the
curriculum of the VET programme.
Apart from this feedback from the companies, other weak points we have
detected are:
● The impossibility to combine dual VET with a traineeship period abroad. If
the dual VET is happening under a working contract, this combination is
legally impossible with the current regulations. If it´s happening under a
grant, it is legally possible but it´s very difficult to accomplish with the 800
hours of learning in company that the student needs to fulfil in an
academic year if that student has to go abroad 3 months before the
academic year ends. Besides, it is difficult to find a company available to
leave one of its workers to go abroad for 3 months.
● In relation with shared apprenticeship schemes, even in the local level is
not possible for the same reasons.
Further Reading
“Guía de la Formación Profesional Dual en Régimen de Alternancia del País
Vasco”
http://www.hezkuntza.ejgv.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/hezibi/es_def/adj
untos/FPDUAL_Euskadi_(castellano).pdf
References
http://formacion.confebask.es/Corporativa/Default.aspx?Xqp5O3l6Vf2coyiwQtPRI
A90785678d90785678d
https://www.fpeuskadidual.eus/
DELTA (2017-1-UK01-KA202-036810) IO3